As the sun sets on the thirty-year lifespan of the 1996 Ganges Water Treaty, Bangladesh finds itself at a historical crossroads that will define its ecological and economic viability for the next century. But the 2026 deadline for renewal of the treaty, a landmark water treaty between India and Bangladesh, is a moment of reckoning, not merely a diplomatic formality. The people of this delta have lived under the yoke of an agreement that promised equity but delivered exhaustion for three decades. If Dhaka enters negotiations with the same submissive posture that has characterized Bangladesh’s water policy for years, they will not just be signing a treaty—they will be signing the death warrant of our riverine heritage.
The evidence of thirty years of failure is etched into the cracked silt of our riverbeds. The 1996 treaty was hailed as a landmark of “neighborhood first” diplomacy, yet for the farmers of the Hardinge Bridge area and the residents of the southwest, it has been a mirage. Available statistics — often sanitized by official joint commissions — reveal a harrowing reality: in at least 39 out of the last 60 drought cycles, Bangladesh failed to receive its stipulated share of water that international law recognizes as a shared resource, especially during the critical lean season. While the treaty dictates a specific formula for sharing at the Farakka Barrage, the “spirit of cooperation” has consistently evaporated whenever the upstream flow dwindles.
Today, the consequence of this lopsided water arrangement is a national crisis of existential proportions. No fewer than 79 of our rivers — the lifeblood of our agriculture, transport, and ecosystem — are currently dry or dying. But this is not a natural disaster; it is rather a man-made catastrophe. It is the direct result of a hydro-political landscape where India, as the upper riparian power and often-mentioned friend, wields absolute control over the tap. From the Farakka Barrage to the countless upstream diversions and massive “water conservancy” projects, the Ganges is being systematically bled white before it ever crosses our border.
India (credit: https://pixabay.com/).
What is more concerning than the historical failure is the current trajectory of negotiations between the two parties. Reports emerging from the corridors of power suggest that New Delhi is pursuing a “predatory” negotiation strategy. India is allegedly pushing for even more unfavorable terms, instead of the correction of the systemic flaws of the 1996 agreement. India’s demand to shorten the term to mere 10 or 15 years is alarming. By shortening the term, India wants to ensure that Dhaka remains a perennial supplicant, forced to return to the negotiating table every decade to beg for the very water. It will prevent long-term infrastructure planning and keep national interests subservient to the shifting political whims of New Delhi.
Furthermore, we must address the “elephant in the room” that has become a monument to diplomatic paralysis: the Teesta River. For over a decade, the Teesta agreement has been held hostage by the internal federal politics and the lack of strong willingness of our neighbor. While we wait for a signature that never comes, the northern districts of Bangladesh are rapidly desertifying due to the lack of water. The government’s historical reliance on Indian “assurances” has proven to be a strategic blunder of the highest order.
It is vital for the administration in Dhaka to immediately pivot and prioritize the Teesta River Master Plan. Bangladesh can no longer afford to wait for a mere “friendly” gesture from across the border. Protecting national interests means taking unilateral action to safeguard the Teesta basin through a variety of ways, including comprehensive dredging, reservoir construction, and modernized irrigation systems. But if India refuses to share the crucial Testa water, we must maximize every drop that reaches us and do so with a sense of urgency that reflects the desperation of the farmers of northern Bangladesh.
The upcoming renewal of the 1996 Ganges Water Treaty must represent a radical departure from the earlier framework. We cannot negotiate water, which international law recognizes as a shared resource, based on the hydrological data of the 1990s. The climate has changed, the siltation levels have risen, and the needs of the population of Bangladesh have surged. Any new water treaty between India and Bangladesh must be grounded in the current climate and water conditions, incorporating the reality of glacial melt and erratic monsoons.
The influence of India on Bangladesh’s internal water policies has, for too long, sidelined our national interests. We have seen our fishermen lose their livelihoods, and our salt wedge moves further inland, poisoning our soil and impacting agriculture. But this must be stopped. The Ganges and the Teesta are not gifts from India; they are international rivers protected by the principles of equitable utilization and the obligation not to cause significant harm. India needs to acknowledge the rights of Bangladesh. As the negotiations intensify, the government must remember that its mandate comes from the people of Bangladesh, not from the diplomatic circles of New Delhi.
To accept another 30 years — or worse, a truncated 10 years — of the status quo would be an act of historical negligence. Dhaka must stand firm against the injustice, ensure its rights, and make sure that the rivers of Bangladesh are not allowed to vanish into the archives of failed diplomacy. The time for quiet whispers and backroom deals is over. The roar of the drying rivers is now a scream for justice.
DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Magazine. Views published are the sole responsibility of the author(s).
